澳洲亿忆网

 找回密码
电话登录/注册
查看: 20833|回复: 13

[试题分享] 法律company law, taxation law, business law辅导

[复制链接]
发表于 2015-10-5 | 显示全部楼层
冲刺期末了,commercial law, taxation law, company law, 辅导微信elainechen2004


分享:法律答题模板
In salomon case, creditors may not seek payment from directors of the debtor company .
The company can be sued for the repayment by a creditor  under s124 .

那么什么时候directors could  owe duties to the creditors 呢? contract 微信elainechen2004
for business law /commercial law , sample

ISSUE
The legal issue in this matter concerns the contractual elements of ‘offer', ‘acceptance’ and the ‘postal acceptance rule’.
RULE
In order to have a valid agreement, there must be a clear offer (compared with a request for information) and acceptance must be communicated to the offeror (Powell v Lee (1908) 24 TLR 606). One exception to this general rule is the ‘postal acceptance rule’ which provides that ............................. (Adams v Lindsell (1818) 106 ER 250). However, if the communication concerns email as an instantaneous method of communication, the accepted view is that..................................................................

APPLY
...................................................................

Your statement "I hear that you want to sell your Samsung Galaxy. If it is in good condition and if the price is right, I would like to buy it. ....................

On the other hand, if Ivy’s response “The phone is in excellent condition and is cheap at $700" is construed as an offer, it is likely you have formed a binding contract with her.

Given your acceptance was sent to Ivy’s specified email address, under s 14A(1) of the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) the communication was ‘received’ when it became capable of being retrieved by Ivy.

The facts also state that.................................................................................................

CONCLUSION

Based on the preceding analysis, there is a valid agreement between Ivy and you only if
Ivy’s response is considered an offer.  .................................................

更多资讯,关注微信elainechen2004

联系我时,请注明来自亿忆网!未经书面许可,严禁转载!
下载手机亿忆APP
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-10-8 | 显示全部楼层
Company law :

director 部分是个重点,那么有个细节,考试案例分析都有, 就是关于解聘director 问题,一个要看程序,另外要看实质内容是否有欺压类的现象,。。。。。咨询加微信elainechen2004
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-10-9 | 显示全部楼层
Company law 的时候, 依据s140, constitution 在director 和company 之间,company 和member 之间,memeber 和member 之间形成合约关系, 这个法条没有确立member 和director 合约的关系,一般情况下,member 无权起诉director 的, 那么如果director 行为侵害了member 的利益,member 如何维护自己的利益呢?有什么特例呢? 咨询微信elainechen2004
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-10-19 | 显示全部楼层
commercial law:

Contract :
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement
In order for a contract to be legally enforceable, it must adhere to certain requirements:
讨论加微信elainechen2004
1.there must be an agreement;
2.the parties must intend their agreement to be enforceable; and
3.both parties must provide consideration.
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-10-19 | 显示全部楼层
tax law : notes :

repair 可claim deduction, 但replacement 不能claim deduction , repair 和replacement 有什么区别呢?
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-10-26 | 显示全部楼层
Commercial law , ACL 部分,重点在于S18, S21,22....
合同法律注意disclaimer 的讨论啊,有疑问咨询elainechen2004
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-2 | 显示全部楼层
commercial law : 要点:
misrepresentation , disclaimer, ACL  的
一个有态度的亿忆网友
头像被屏蔽
发表于 2015-11-4 | 显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2015-11-19 | 显示全部楼层
LAW 要多读case 啊
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2016-1-23 | 显示全部楼层
tax law 里东西很杂,先理解
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2016-3-21 | 显示全部楼层
commercial law 要多读案例啊。。。。
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-2 | 显示全部楼层
final 来了。。。。
一个有态度的亿忆网友
 楼主| 发表于 2016-5-24 | 显示全部楼层
考前的notes ,要精,而且明了,不是越多越好。。。
一个有态度的亿忆网友
留学移民培训类赞助商

时尚服装美容类赞助商


生活服务类赞助商

快递代购类赞助商

其它类赞助商

下载APP

亿忆澳洲

亿忆澳洲

返回顶部

返回板块返回板块

快速评论